Build a Bilingual Source Map Before Rewriting an Israeli SaaS Product Page

When an AI answer cites an unexpected page, read the sentence beside the citation. A product overview may support the identity of a tool. A support article may explain how to complete a task. Neither necessarily supports the plan price printed in the next sentence. Looking only at a list of domains hides that difference.

Take the bilingual website question in Nir Levi’s October pilot. In one English opening the exported reference pointed to a website-builder comparison. In the Hebrew opening from the same round it pointed to an overview of Wix Multilingual. In the second Hebrew opening the reference was a Wix support page about right-to-left content. The two Hebrew references shared a hostname but addressed different reader needs.

Make the map useful to an editor

Start with four columns: the buyer’s question, the claim in the answer, the cited page and the evidence on that page. Add a fifth for the exact company page that could do a better job. If the claim concerns a language switcher, open the candidate page on a phone and try to find the behavior described. Record a mismatch precisely: “explains how to add a language, does not show how the existing form behaves.”

Give the proposed change an owner and a test. A support lead could publish the actual settings and expected form behavior; a local editor could check the Hebrew labels against the product. Revisit the saved prompts after publication, preserving earlier responses. An improved page is a result the team controls. Whether a future answer chooses to cite it is a separate observation.

Study and archived answers: https://nirlevi.com/en/research/israeli-geo-hebrew-english/